karavan

Capt, na vsak način bi rad predstavil yogo in hinduizem kot žrtev, kot ubogi jaz. "Ubogi jaz" sindrom je znan pojav v psihologiji, na ta način otroci, stare mame, narcisoidneži in manipulatorji izsiljujejo pozornost in sočutje, v resnici pa je to njihovo orodje za manipulacijo okolice. Če jim ne rata, so pa žleht tako kot ti. Kaj pa o Sanatan Dharmi pravi izkušeni ex Swami Roman iz www.sexabuseyidl.org, to je eden prvih Sweamijevih posvečencev, gradil jogo od začetka, pa glej ga no, isti kot ČiČI! What is real on this and many other similar traditions is to use the "spirituality or Hindu Sanatan Dharma" (but we could also pick any other religious traditions) for taking advantage of people of any class, origin, sex etc. In the name of the highest good many times happened the ugliest things like enslavement, brainwashing, financial destruction, physical and sexual abuse, you name it. It was always easily recognizable by the official response to challenges of those powerful structures. Denial, denial, denial and if we see more facts against us then more denial. Déjà vu all over again. Sleep well and sweet dear bhaktas, sleep, sleep, sleep. Cover yourself with stinky ugly blanket like your beloved old master did and sleep well and sweet…………….

Capt ki se ukvarja s spiritualnostjo za svoj duhovni razvoj - nič ne pomaga. Prostaški in grob kot ponavadi.

vse religije so ideologije, v katerih imenu samozvani "pravoverni" maltretirajo vse ostale. Naj raznolike religije počivajo v miru v zgodovinskem spominu, katera je ta prava se ne bomo nikdar zmenili. kdor hoče in zna pa naj se veseli sonca in lune, zraka in vode in naj išče in poimenuje svoje bogove v vsem, kar ga obdaja.

Preveri na internetu in se pozanimaj, preden začneš, poišči vadbo brez spiritualne navlake, ki te bo še dodatno zmedla! Pozdrav soncu je krasna vaja, poskusi!

Več jih čaka na take, kot si ti, pazi da se ne opečeš. Namenjeno prestrašenemu Primorcu73

Če vas zanima, kako se razvija seksualni škandal s Swamijijem, poglejte na avstrijski forum, http://www.esoterikforum.at/forum/showthread.php?t=149397&page=27 kjer je zadnja zanimivost izjava nemškega swamijijevega učenca, ki je po prvem šoku nad pričanji žensk na www.swamiji-maheshwarananda-abuse.com naredil svojo lastno raziskavo na nemškem področju in prišel do naslednjih zaključkov: Now for the english speaking world: For the clarity: I am a disciple who until three weeks ago did pray all this it-can-not-be-at-all-stuff up and down. Until i came into contact with real people out of love for the truth and did research in the whole world. After six days this old world had a tsunamilike breakdown just the same way that yidl will break down. That is only a question of time and it needs no Chidanand for that. Swamiji started this destruction personally with the first sexual or criminal act of his. Nothing happens without a reason. Chidanand is not at all interesting in the meantime. Only he brought this thing into moving. Since three weeks i know such an infinite number of stories from three directly involved women and many talks with first hand witnesses. One puzzle piece joins the next one. There was consensual and also not so consensual sex between Swamiji and disciple women – since tens and tens of years. And last thing mentioned is an absolute no go and we are not discussing criminal law or personality rights matters (that is another very complicated field). It is all only about what a master is allowed to do and what not. And to have sex with disciples is an absolute no go in his case at least: to do it as a (wannabe) enlightened one, as a swami and all in hidden not openly. Not a single sexual act can be accepted. But everybody can have his opinion here. And really, i had like many but also not like all in YidL never heard during my time in YidL not even a single rumour about such things. That has really struck me like thunder and it is a long story. It is now clear to me how these stories could be kept under the carpet for thirty years (ore even more?). And three weeks ago I thought this not at all to be possible. About this I will post later. Now your question: quite easy, Swamijis master cannot have been an enlightened master. Siddhis the yogic superpowers which are coming long before selfrealisation (see Patanjali 3rd chapter, it is only about that). Swamiji called that always the second level of Maya, the second level of the big ego testing. If you have Siddhis – i am taking the short cut and have no personal experiences with them – you can use them in a positive or a negative way. There is a lot of stories about that. If his master would have been realised he would not have allowed it [remember spirituality to be of cristall clear purity, Patanjalis principles like nonviolence, truth(fulness) and bramacharya, which clearly means celibacy for swamis have to lived. And there the master has to live also what he preaches!!!]. That is where any fun ends. Since his master has done nothing no matter if he had siddhis or not he at least posed himself passively behind his disciple and he is therefore no better. And now no still-Swamiji follower can say that Guruji did not know because that is against the doctrine and therefore contradictory. But others can: According to the laws of logic he is either a charlatan and did not know anything or he had siddhis and did know or had no siddhis and also knew – but he did not do anything to stop it. Or he enjoyed the same fun. By the way I can imagine that this is a possibility even though that thought is extremly difficult to think. But in this story it is like that, something that Swamiji often cited: Nothing is impossible in this universe.

Jutranjik, kar mi ni bilo do zdaj všeč pri tebi, ki si kakor pač si, je tvoje komandiranje in vsevednost, kaj smemo in kaj ne smemo in tvoje klasifikacije, kaj je in kaj ni. To pa ni ravno demokratično, lahko bi rekli, da je kar precej nasilno. Tako kot se je v tej debati izkazala tudi JVVŽ in njen sistem, po katerem funkcionira, kjer reševanje konfliktov temelji na: MOLČI! TI SI NOR (NORA)! LAŽEŠ! PAZI SE! Zlo je pa vedno relativna zadeva: vsak ga meri s svojim vatlom.

pri meni so pa zmeraj same škorpjonke, pravzaprav dve življenjski škorpijonki, ta prva kot iz knjige, hudičeva skratka- molčeča, zahrbtna in maščevalna, ta druga pa ravno obratno, tako da se na astrologijo ne zanašam več.