W E A

[ananta]

First published by Klaudio Zic Publications, 2008, www.lulu.com/astrology. Copyright © 2008 By Klaudio Zic. All Rights Reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, for commercial purposes or otherwise, without the written permission of the author, except when permitted by law.

 

 

 

 

STARFINDER

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2008 by Klaudio Zic, all rights reserved. http://www.lulu.com/astrology

 

 

 

 

YOUR NATAL SKIES

 

 

Everybody has an instinctive, even elvish reverence towards starry nights where universe reveals to the seeker as the reflex one's own soul. Stargazers have organized this universe by divine inspiration into meaningful clusters of angels, that is, stars, for the seeker to find, rely upon and be absorbed into. Understandably the skies are a rather complicated puzzle that required simplification when organized. Due to rotation we have thus 88 ascendants, much as the local zodiac counts 22 constellations. We had to get rid of Pluto in order to come to the ancient number 22 as present within e.g. Hebrew tradition. Thus for a serious astronomer, the sky is divided in 16 ascendants for the current epoch, with a total of 88, while the local zodiac enlivens in 22 zodiacal constellations. The Academic Zodiac materials are presented in scientific form as publication and animations. The old, obsolete or openly wrong systems will of course gradually fall-off with time, but as ever, peole tend to cling even to systems they know are right. The rationale is that if we have all been wrong for a while, the collective error is pardonable, even historical. Well, it is good to hear that some errors have been discovered, but not corrected. There is a general consensus that systems lag one sign or one constellation but that is another error, since they lag two constellations, that is to say that you horoscope is miscalculated by two signs. If you easily accepted one sign of error, then you will be happy with two signs of error, much as the cuckold who does not count any more. You know that they lie to you bit you do not care any more. One more lie will do. If most astronomy bigwigs never fully explored the zodiac, what is there for the commoner to care? In that case you will be happy with whatever cosy superstition since you are into fun and not at all astrology proper. This reduces the number of astrologers to perhaps 5 since Enoch.

 

 

BLUNDER #1

 

 

The first error to make is the only error that the masses will ever make, namely to assume that the ephemeris, book or computer program will help in calculating the natal horoscope. It is true that various tools do calculate something, but sadly also true that your natal horoscope can not be calculated with tools feeding popular superstition, that is various ephemerides, programs or booklets. How do you know that the program is a fake? The program that was made for fun easily omits altitude, lacks a planetarium or proposes different house systems. If the program has a planetarium, it is probably too primitive for any use. In that respect, Astrolog is a program with a rather operative planetarium. You can check the natal positions for the planets with this simple, yet illuminating program, which by the way is freeware. You will find that the planets and asteroids tend to abandon the ecliptic as venturing into peculiar constellations that are yours to discover. Thus, even with a primitive Astrolog program, one can check for the natal position of the Sun and planets. Many other commercial program will have an embedded planetarium that can be checked for ascendant and true natal positions.

 

 

BLUNDER #2

 

 

The second error as made by sincere seekers is to assume that there is a so-called sidereal system to protect their natal data or even an Indian system that would save them from major errors as concern precession. Many will make the error of following blindly people who do not agree as to ayanamsa or in fact anything. Paradoxically, there will be combining between systems, adjusting to market demands, concessions and compromise.

 

 

COMBINED BLUNDERS

 

 

If one system is wrong, the other is right and vice versa. Absurdly, some Indian astrologers adopted the western ways in their mundane calculations, possibly under the suggestion that it is the one who is wrong that commands (at) this time. However it might be, the error is not just two signs, as there are hundreds of serious errors, that make western or eastern as obsolete as plain guessing. Guessing one's natal Sun position has become rather tricky. We informed Sai Baba, the avatar of truth, that his own natal Sun is in Libra on November 23rd, as confirmed by the observatory next door in his natal town.

 

 

ASSORTED BLUNDERS

 

 

The first error is thus to blunder towards your local astrologer. That is an error in trust. The second is to trust the antipode, the distant sage. Amazingly, the only one that is not trusted at all is entrusted with space programs. The fathers of astronomy of course agree on the Academic Zodiac. The Mayan system was built on precisely the same principles and the early Egyptian fits in. The Chinese equatorial system goes nicely along with the Cartesian house system, thus there is cooperation between the so-to-say historical sky and the real scientific sky. Any Navajo or Hopi system will fit in since based on the true sky.

 

 

Klaudio Zic

 

 

Copyright © 2008 by Klaudio Zic, all rights reserved worldwide.

Redistribution of this file in any form is violation of the Copyright Law.

This copyrighted material has been previously published as available from http://www.lulu.com/astrology

Copyright © 2008 By Klaudio Zic. All Rights Reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced or

Transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, for commercial purposes or otherwise,

without the written permission of the author, except when permitted by law.