Testi

[Marsa]

jaz pa zlo nizko...

a ni zanimiv?!

[Aliana]

Paranoid: Low

Schizoid: Low

Schizotypal: Moderate

Antisocial: Low

Borderline: Low

Histrionic: High

Narcissistic: Moderate

Avoidant: Low

Dependent: Low

Obsessive-Compulsive: Low

 

Pa itak se ne strinjam, mal pretiravajo Pa polovica vprašanj je tko prozornih, da ti je prec jasno kam pes taco moli

 

sicer pa.. kaj je normalno pa kaj je vkalupljeno že...

[Guest sstane]

Test za pametne ljudi!

 

Spodaj so štiri (4) vprašanja in eno bonus vprašanje. TAKOJ morate odgovoriti na njih. Ne smete zavlačevati, odgovorite takoj! OK?

Pa, da vidimo koliko ste resnično pametni. Pripravljeni?

Gremo !!! (scroll down)

 

Prvo vprašanje:

 

Sodelujete v teku. Prehiteli ste drugo osebo. NA KATEREM MESTU STE VI?

 

Odgovor:

 

Če ste odgovorili da ste prvi, NI PRAVILNO! Če prehitite drugo osebo in zavzamete njeno mesto, potem ste DRUGI! Poskušajte, da ne zgrešite drugo vprašanje.

 

Da bi odgovorili na drugo vprašanje, ne razmišljajte tako dolgo, kot ste pri prvem!

 

Drugo vprašanje:

 

Če prehitite zadnjo osebo, potem ste...?

 

Odgovor:

 

Če ste odgovorili da ste PREDZADNJI, potem ponovno nimate prav. Razmislite, kako lahko prehitite ZADNJO osebo?

 

Niste prav dobri v tem! A ne!

 

Tretje vprašanje:

 

Zelo zajebantska matematika! To morate opraviti BEZ kalkulatorja ali pisala -

na pamet. Poskusite zdaj!

 

Vzamite 1000 in dodajte 40, dodajte še 1000. Zdaj dodajte 30.

Dodajte spet 1000 in dodajte še 20. In zdaj dodajte še 1000.

Dododajte 10. Koliko je to SKUPAJ?

 

Spustite se navzdol da vidite odgovor.

 

Ste dobili dobili 5000?

Točen odgovor je pravzaprav 4100.

 

Ne verjamete? Preverite s kalkulatorjem! Danas definitivno ni Vaš dan.

 

Mogoče

boste pravilno odgovorili na naslednje vprašanje.

 

Četrto vprašanje:

 

Marijin oče ima 5 hčerk: 1. Nana, 2. Nene, 3. Nini, 4. Nono. Kako je ime peti hčerki?

 

Odgovor: Nunu?

 

NE! Seveda ne.

Njeno ime je Marija. Ponovno preberite vprašanje.

 

OK, sedaj pa bonus vprašanje:

 

Gluhonema oseba zeli kupiti zobno ščetko. Da bi prodajalcu pojasnila kaj želi kupiti, imitira ščetkanje zob.

 

Slep človek želi kupiti sončna očala, kako bo to pojasnil prodajalcu?

 

 

Odgovor:

 

Enostavno, odpre usta in pove kaj želi.

 

 

POŠLJITE TO DALJE, DA ZAFRUSTRIRATE PAMETNE LJUDI!!!

[Sprehajalec]

Tist k je res pameten mu ni problema to rešit.

 

So pa dobre fore, ja - se da hitro zmotit. Če maš še kej tega, kr pošlji

[klarus]

hm.... test za 'prejšnje' življenje

 

 

 

 

Ne vem kako se ti to sliši, ampak v prejšnjem življenju si bil moški. Rodil si se nekje tam, kjer je danes Jugoslavija leta 1075. Približno.

Po poklicu si bila oziroma bil ovčar, jezdec, gozdar.

Kratek opis tvojega psihološkega profila v prejšnjem življenju:

Revolucionarnega značaja. Bil si navdih za spremembe v katerikoli smeri - politika, posli, religija, gospodinjstvo. Lahko bi bil tudi vodja.

Naloga, ki si jo prinesel iz prejšnjega življenja:

Zavezan si k rešitvi problema onesnaževanja okolja, recikliranja, napačne uporabe surovih materialov, k odpravi radioaktivnosti na vseh področjih.

Se sedaj spomniš?

[Marsa]

Ne vem kako se ti to sliši, ampak v prejšnjem življenju si bil moški. Rodil si se nekje tam, kjer je danes Jugoslavija leta 1075. Približno.

Po poklicu si bila oziroma bil ovčar, jezdec, gozdar.

Kratek opis tvojega psihološkega profila v prejšnjem življenju:

Revolucionarnega značaja. Bil si navdih za spremembe v katerikoli smeri - politika, posli, religija, gospodinjstvo. Lahko bi bil tudi vodja.

Naloga, ki si jo prinesel iz prejšnjega življenja:

Zavezan si k rešitvi problema onesnaževanja okolja, recikliranja, napačne uporabe surovih materialov, k odpravi radioaktivnosti na vseh področjih.

Se sedaj spomniš?

 

vsaj ni vsem druzinskim clanom tole prislo (no saj, al pa probaj ).

nam je ze na forumu fulim isto prslo.

[Marsa]

what is your personality type?

jaz naj bi bila: strategist samo še extrovert moram ratat, ...potem bom BIG thinker

 

ma, vse se da spremenit, ne bi mi škodilo ,če bi imela več filinga, samodiscipline (leader) in če bi se bolj opirala na dejstva...

thanx!

 

videt je kul, 1. stopnja moja je (jasno) spontaneous..

 

vendar se mi zatakne pri 2. setu..

ne vem kaksna sem.

lohk sem TROJE.

(Realistic, enthusiastic and spontaneous, Inventive, imaginative and original in Creative, dynamic and adventurous)

[Marsa]

x!x :xx!:

 

"Your answers suggest you are undefined".

halo, jaz pa tolk resno resevala, cist sem se poglobila, se mi je zdel kar dober testek...

pol pa TOLE.

[Marsa]

tebi

 

jaz bi bila tudi undefined zakaj meni ne rata tko GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

 

 

mas prav, thanx!!!

 

bedast, ponasam se s tem, da me ne mros dat v predalc4ek, pol se hocem pa sama tlact not al kaj!

 

 

(*sam to se mi tko odstekan zdi, vseen.... morda je kaj vmes.... prekinlo.. ker ze od 2. seta dalje mi ni nic vmesnega napisal...

sam lohk bi pa tud blo...

ker sem IN navdusena in impulzivna IN stvarna in objektivna. se mi zdi. itak smo dvojni. mal odstekan, da ne bi v nobenga pasal, saj konc koncev so najbrz kaki scori, tko da - od y --x je recimo thinker... od x -- z pa kajjazvem kaj. cudn, skratka - bom sla se 1x resit, sam nom mogla vedt, ce sem cist iste obkrozla.. ker sem se ponekod kar v 3 nasla, ne sam v 2, sem morala ornk pomislit, da kaj od tega je BOLJ res)

[Marsa]

no vids, jaz pa ze vmes nisem nic dobila! :xx!:

 

evo no, to je to, ko vam pravim v dnevniku, pa mi kateri sem ziher ne verjamejo...

ko jaz uletim v sisteme, se pobrkajo, no.

undefined. :|||

med 20, 30 tipi. cudno da ni prislo %#scaroneˇ÷&.

[angeo]

Personality test:MENTOR

 

 

 

Summary of Mentors:

 

 

Warm and lively people who focus on the needs of others

Bring people together and encourage group participation

Think of themselves as intelligent, outgoing and sensitive

May become overbearing in their quest for harmony

 

cool,link Diana

[Marsa]

:xx!: mater, nc, ga bom sla se 1x resit, zdaj me pa ze firbec matra.

[Marsa]

haha, mi je ratal se infiltrirat in vkalupit.

 

I'm a performer.

no ja..

tezko je - recimo sem blazno razpeta med - a sem logicna in analiticna (kar sem zlo) in med driven in energetic (kar sem pac tud ) - prakticno se ne mroem odlocit...

 

spontaneous/facts/heart/extrovert - mi je prslo....

tud me je rpesenetil, da je prslo facts, po 2. strani pa spet ne.

 

Summary of Performers

 

* Love fun, people and the world around them

* Prefer hands-on learning to reading a book

* Think of themselves as enthusiastic, sociable or sensitive

* May forget about commitments because they're having so much fun

 

tole mi je pa vsec: "This group believes you can get work done efficiently and have fun at the same time. Others are naturally drawn to the Performers' outgoing nature and enjoyment of life."

 

~

evo da je res.. nekaj je blo narobe.

sam me prav zanima, kolkrat pride onole undefined in je hec, da je glih pr men.

Pravzaprav se zdaj bolj najdem v undefined kot pa ravno v performerju.

[Outlaw]

Ne vem če je že bil priliman ta link...

 

Taboo test:

 

http://www.philosophersnet.com/games/taboo.htm

 

 

Results:

 

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.04.

 

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

 

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00.

 

You see very little wrong in the actions depicted in these scenarios. However, to the extent that you do, it is a moot point how you might justify it. You don't think that an act can be morally wrong if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. Yet the actions described in these scenarios are private like this and it was specified as clearly as possible that they didn't involve harm. Maybe, despite these stipulations, you just can't believe no harm would have resulted. The trouble is that you were asked to judge the scenarios as described, not as you think they would have turned out in the real world. And given how they were described, it isn't clear what form such harms could take...

 

 

http://i2.tinypic.com/sm4zrl.jpg

[Alan_New]

He he, dober test.

 

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.38.

 

Your Interference Factor is: 0.50.

 

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.50.

 

http://www.philosophersnet.com/images/moral_musings13.jpg

 

"Although you do not evaluate the actions depicted in these scenarios to be across the board wrong, it is not entirely clear why you think that anything in them is morally problematic. You don't think an action can be morally wrong if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. Yet the actions described in these scenarios are private like this and it was specified as clearly as possible that they didn't involve harm. Possibly an argument could be made that the people undertaking these actions are in some way harmed by them. But you don't think that an action can be morally wrong solely for the reason that it harms the person undertaking it. So even this doesn't seem to be enough to make the actions described in these scenarios wrong in terms of your moral outlook. It is a bit of a puzzle!"

 

I am puzzled as well.

[Guest mačona]

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.54.

 

Your Interference Factor is: 0.25.

 

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.67.

 

Are you thinking straight about morality?

 

It is not at all clear why you think that any of the actions depicted in these scenarios are morally problematic. You don't think an action can be morally wrong if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. Yet the actions described in these scenarios are private like this and it was specified as clearly as possible that they didn't involve harm. Possibly an argument could be made that the people undertaking these actions are harmed in some way by them. But you don't think that an action can be morally wrong solely for the reason that it harms the person undertaking it. So even this doesn't seem to be enough to make the actions described in these scenarios wrong in terms of your moral outlook. It is a bit of a puzzle!

 

tisti moder kvadrat pa mam v kvadrantu "personal morality"

[Guest mačona]

Čakra test, za katerega je link podala Diana, pa je bil med izbrisanimi objavami:

 

http://www.eclecticenergies.com/chakras/chakratest.php

[Guest mačona]

solarplexus mam slab. spolno, grleno in kronsko najbolj odprto?

Root: open (25%)

Sacral: open (50%)

Navel: open (19%)

Heart: open (31%)

Throat: open (56%)

Third Eye: open (31%)

Crown: open (50%)

 

Percentages go from -100% to +100%

[Tanci]

jaz imam pa samo kronsko, čelno in srčno čakro odprto

[Guest mačona]

če sklepamo po mojih razultatih, največ seksam, govorim in se počutim povezanan z Bogom, intuitivna in sočutna sem pol že malo manj, prizemljena še manj , energije in volje do moči mam pa še namanj.

[Trudi]

Kaj zdej sexsaš z bogom

[Guest mačona]

Saj sem Devica Marija, kako le ne bi seksala z bogom?

[Trudi]

[manara]

http://www.matthewbarr.co.uk/simpsons/

 

Jaz sem Lisa Simpon

Popravljeno 2. oktober 2006 -> manara

[manara]

Pa še en, tak zanimiv... ne vem če je že bil...