bog je od vedno

[aakhut]

Jezus pravi,jaz sem življenje,jaz sem luč sveta,jaz sem kruh življenja,jaz sem resnica,jaz sem pot,jaz sem vrata,jaz sem dobri pastir,jaz sem vstajenje.

 

jaz sem pa.....J A Z

x^x

 

zlomk....tralala

[mici59]

Veruj v Gospoda Jezusa in rešen boš ti in tvoja hiša{Apostolska dela16,31}

[zerkalo]

Nihče ne stori toliko slabega kot ljudje, ki hodijo okrog in delajo dobra dela.

(Življenje, Creighton, Mandell, 1843-1901)

[mici59]

Nihče ne stori toliko slabega kot ljudje, ki hodijo okrog in delajo dobra dela.

(Življenje, Creighton, Mandell, 1843-1901)

Nihče ne stori toliko slabega kot ljudje,ki ne poskrbijo za duhovne lepote,ki jih daje Gospod Jezus,ki nas varuje,ki varuje naše družine in predvsem otroke.Obstajajo tudi otroci,ki nimajo nikogar,imajo žive pa hkrati mrtve starše,ki ničesar ne storijo za dobro svojih otrok,da le ti propadajo za računalniki,v slabi družbi,ki pa jim vseeno pomeni več,kot nikoli dorasli starši za vlogo,ki jim je bila namenjena,to je,davplivajo na otroke,da postanejo ljudje vredni tega imena.lepo in svežo noč vam želim

[emanuel]

Mici, neki me zanima. Temi si dala naslov Bog je od vedno. V Svetem pismu pa piše "V začetku je bila beseda".

Ker pa je jasno, da nič, kar ima svoj začetek ni večno, me zanima, ali je po tvojem Bog od vedno al sam od začetka?

[mici59]

Mici, neki me zanima. Temi si dala naslov Bog je od vedno. V Svetem pismu pa piše "V začetku je bila beseda".

Ker pa je jasno, da nič, kar ima svoj začetek ni večno, me zanima, ali je po tvojem Bog od vedno al sam od začetka?

Jezus se v Svetem Pismu pojavlja pod raznimi imeni,,Mesija,Odrešenik,Resnica,stara zaveza celo Jahve,in Beseda,pa še kaj.Vstavi v začetek namesto Besede Jezus in dobiš,,V začetku je bil Jezus in JEZUS je bil pri Očetu,sicer je pa odgovor od vedno zato tudi takšen naslov.lepo se imej

[aakhut]

 

bemti!!!!

sej priznam, de sm katolik...pa dce tut zagovarjam do neke mere pochetje cerkve...pa v konchni fazi tut ostale lonchine....pa recimo do neke mere newage....

ampak bemu

na JURISHNIKE (te al pa one farbe) sm pa preklet alergichen.... :xx!:

 

zlomk...tralala

[mici59]

Bog je namreč tisti,ki po svojem blagohotnem načrtu,udejanja v vas hotenje in delovanje.Vse delajte brez godrnanja in preračunljivosti,da boste neoporečni in nepokvarjeni,brezgrajni Božji otroci sredi sprijenega in pokvarjenega rodu,med katerim žarite na svetu kakor zvezde.Držite se besede življenja.{pismo filipljanim2,13,14}

[butl]

Bog je namreč tisti,ki po svojem blagohotnem načrtu,udejanja v vas hotenje in delovanje.Vse delajte brez godrnanja in preračunljivosti,da boste neoporečni in nepokvarjeni,brezgrajni Božji otroci sredi sprijenega in pokvarjenega rodu,med katerim žarite na svetu kakor zvezde.Držite se besede življenja.{pismo filipljanim2,13,14}

 

Eeee, Mici, mislm, kaj že, lep pozdrav

 

Kva se tole tko fino fest bere skor.

 

Eeee, kva mislš, kako bi se bral šele, če bi se drugo osebo množine zamenjal s prvo osebo ednine, a?

 

Samo, ja, maš prou, ne bi blo fajn, sploh ne. Naj kr tko ostane. Naj drugi delajo a ne. Ker če bi blo v prvi osebi ednine, mislm, pol bi moral jst delat. To pa ne, prosim lepo. Je pa že bolš /beri lažje/ druge, kva že, učit.

 

Halo, zmed zaveso, spustu sem se.

 

[mici59]

Zaupaj v Gospoda z vsem svojim srcem,na svojo razumnost pa se ne zanašaj.Na vse svojih poteh ga spoznavaj in on bo uravnaval tvoje steze.{pregovori3,5,6}

[mici59]

Kajti kakor pride dež in sneg izpod neba in se ne vrača tja,ne da bi napojil zemljo,jo naredil rodovitno in brstečo,dal sejalcu seme in uživalcu kruh,tako bo z mojo besedo,ki prihaja iz mojih ust,ne vrna se k meni brez uspeha,temveč bo storila,kar sem hotel,in uspela v tem,za kar sem jo poslal.{izaija55,10,11}

[mici59]

Ne ljubite sveta in tudi ne tistega,kar je v svetu.Če kdo ljubi svet,v njem ni Očetove ljubezni,kajti vse,kar je v svetu-poželenje mesa,poželjenje oči in napuh življenja-ni od Očeta,ampak od sveta.Svet in njegovo poželenje mineta,kdor pa izpolnjuje Božjo voljo,ostane vekomaj.

[mici59]

Ne hvali se z jutrišnjem dnem,kajti ne veš kaj današnji prinaša.Hvali nAj te drug,ne tvoja usta,tujec,ne tvoje ustnice.Težak je kamen in breme je pesek,težja od obeh je bedakova jeza{pregovori27,1}

[XaBelle]

Kajti kakor pride dež in sneg izpod neba in se ne vrača tja,ne da bi napojil zemljo,jo naredil rodovitno in brstečo,dal sejalcu seme in uživalcu kruh,tako bo z mojo besedo,ki prihaja iz mojih ust,ne vrna se k meni brez uspeha,temveč bo storila,kar sem hotel,in uspela v tem,za kar sem jo poslal.{izaija55,10,11}

 

a ti to prepises iz biblije al vse na pamet ves - te stevilke pa ime 'avtorja'?

[mici59]

a ti to prepises iz biblije al vse na pamet ves - te stevilke pa ime 'avtorja'?

sem resnično zelo vesela,da me vprašaš o tem,namreč večina vem napamet,ampak ne celotno besedilo,vem pa na pamet,kje bom kaj našla,se pravi,avtorje, vem ,kje moram iskati,verjetno še kaj napišem,lepo se imej,citati in nasploh vsebina Svetega Pisma je osnovno vodilo v življenju,se pa te knjige verjetno premalo poslužujemo.lp

[expert]

Jst vrjamem v Boga in tega se nisem nikoli sramovala, ampak ne vrjamem v cerkev pobiranje denarja vsekakor ni božje prepričanje

[mici59]

Jst vrjamem v Boga in tega se nisem nikoli sramovala, ampak ne vrjamem v cerkev pobiranje denarja vsekakor ni božje prepričanje

no ,tudi jaz verjamem v Boga po Jezusu Kristusu,ne obiskujem pa tudi cerkve ,verjetno iz podobnega razloga kot ti,ker pobiranje denarja v cerkvah je proti vsem Božjim pravilom,kar je poskušal tudi Luther daavno nekoč popraviti ,ampak je katokiška cerkev,ki še dandanes goji le turizem okrog svojih ustanov,namesto,da bi brali Sveto Pismo

[emanuel]

Jezus se v Svetem Pismu pojavlja pod raznimi imeni,,Mesija,Odrešenik,Resnica,stara zaveza celo Jahve,in Beseda,pa še kaj.Vstavi v začetek namesto Besede Jezus in dobiš,,V začetku je bil Jezus in JEZUS je bil pri Očetu,sicer je pa odgovor od vedno zato tudi takšen naslov.lepo se imej

Ne vem, če tvoja razlaga čist drži. Jezus predstavlja Božansko utelešenje, in kot tak ni od vedno, ampak šele od pred dobrih 2000 let. Resda pa je Duh večen. Sicer pa sprašujem po razliki med tem, kar je od vedno, in med tem, kar je šele od začetka. No, če pa se že ravno spuščaš v razlago prve vrstice, jo imaš pa tukaj (se mi ni dal prevajat pa prepisovat, zato v angleščini).

 

Iz Janezovega velikega evangelija;

 

1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

 

1. This verse has already been the subject of a great many misrepresentations and interpretations; yes, even atheists have made use of this very text to dispute My Deity all the more surely since they in general denied the existence of the Deity. However, we are not going to once again present such false concepts whereby the confusion would only be increased, but shall bring light into the matter with the shortest possible explanation. This as itself light within the primordial light will automatically fight and conquer all misconceptions.

 

2. A main reason why such texts are not understood is unfortunately the very poor and incorrect translation of the Scriptures from the original tongue into the tongues of the present time; but this is for the best. For if the inner meaning of such texts were not hidden as well as it is, that which is holiest therein would long since have been utterly desecrated which would be disastrous for the entire earth. As things are, however, only the outer shell has been marred while the hallowed life has been preserved.

 

3. The time has come to show the true inner meaning of such texts to all who are worthy of participating in this knowledge, but the unworthy will have to pay dearly, for in these things, I will not be trifled with and I shall never take part in a trade.

 

4. Now the explanation shall follow this necessary prelude, but I will still add that here only the inner meaning pertaining to soul and spirit is to be understood and not the innermost, purest heavenly meaning. This is too holy and can be bestowed only on those in the world without harm who seek it through living their life in accordance with the precepts of the Gospel. But the inner meaning pertaining to the soul and spirit may easily be found, sometimes already by means of the correct translation in the respective vernacular of the time, which shall become evident in the explanation of the first verse.

 

5. The expression "In the beginning" is most incorrect and greatly obscures the inner meaning, for thereby even the eternal existence of the Deity could be questioned and disputed, which was also done by some of the older philosophers from whose school the present-day atheists have actually gone forth. But if we now render this text correctly, its cover will be found to be only very thin and it will not be difficult to discover the inner meaning quite clearly and sometimes very accurately through such a thin cover.

 

6. The correct translation shall read thus, In the primordial essence, or also in the primal cause (of all life) was light (the great holy creative thought, the existential idea). This light was not only in, but also with God, that is, the light came forth from God as substantially visible and was thus not only in, but also with God and, as it were, flowed around the primordial divine essence. Thereby the basis for the eventual incarnation of God was given, which becomes plainly evident in the following text.

 

7. Who or what actually was this light, this great thought, this most holy fundamental idea of all future substantial, utterly free existence? — It could not possibly be anything else but God Himself, since God, through God and from God nothing but God Himself could manifest in His eternally, most perfect being — and thus this text may also be read as follows:

 

8. In God was the light; the light flowed through and around God, and God Himself was the light.

 

Na kratko, izraz v začetku je zgrešen, bol pravilno bi bilo; temeljna bit vsega stvarstva je bila velika svetla misel o stvarjenju.

[mici59]

Ne vem, če tvoja razlaga čist drži. Jezus predstavlja Božansko utelešenje, in kot tak ni od vedno, ampak šele od pred dobrih 2000 let. Resda pa je Duh večen. Sicer pa sprašujem po razliki med tem, kar je od vedno, in med tem, kar je šele od začetka. No, če pa se že ravno spuščaš v razlago prve vrstice, jo imaš pa tukaj (se mi ni dal prevajat pa prepisovat, zato v angleščini).

 

Iz Janezovega velikega evangelija;

 

1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

 

1. This verse has already been the subject of a great many misrepresentations and interpretations; yes, even atheists have made use of this very text to dispute My Deity all the more surely since they in general denied the existence of the Deity. However, we are not going to once again present such false concepts whereby the confusion would only be increased, but shall bring light into the matter with the shortest possible explanation. This as itself light within the primordial light will automatically fight and conquer all misconceptions.

 

2. A main reason why such texts are not understood is unfortunately the very poor and incorrect translation of the Scriptures from the original tongue into the tongues of the present time; but this is for the best. For if the inner meaning of such texts were not hidden as well as it is, that which is holiest therein would long since have been utterly desecrated which would be disastrous for the entire earth. As things are, however, only the outer shell has been marred while the hallowed life has been preserved.

 

3. The time has come to show the true inner meaning of such texts to all who are worthy of participating in this knowledge, but the unworthy will have to pay dearly, for in these things, I will not be trifled with and I shall never take part in a trade.

 

4. Now the explanation shall follow this necessary prelude, but I will still add that here only the inner meaning pertaining to soul and spirit is to be understood and not the innermost, purest heavenly meaning. This is too holy and can be bestowed only on those in the world without harm who seek it through living their life in accordance with the precepts of the Gospel. But the inner meaning pertaining to the soul and spirit may easily be found, sometimes already by means of the correct translation in the respective vernacular of the time, which shall become evident in the explanation of the first verse.

 

5. The expression "In the beginning" is most incorrect and greatly obscures the inner meaning, for thereby even the eternal existence of the Deity could be questioned and disputed, which was also done by some of the older philosophers from whose school the present-day atheists have actually gone forth. But if we now render this text correctly, its cover will be found to be only very thin and it will not be difficult to discover the inner meaning quite clearly and sometimes very accurately through such a thin cover.

 

6. The correct translation shall read thus, In the primordial essence, or also in the primal cause (of all life) was light (the great holy creative thought, the existential idea). This light was not only in, but also with God, that is, the light came forth from God as substantially visible and was thus not only in, but also with God and, as it were, flowed around the primordial divine essence. Thereby the basis for the eventual incarnation of God was given, which becomes plainly evident in the following text.

 

7. Who or what actually was this light, this great thought, this most holy fundamental idea of all future substantial, utterly free existence? — It could not possibly be anything else but God Himself, since God, through God and from God nothing but God Himself could manifest in His eternally, most perfect being — and thus this text may also be read as follows:

 

8. In God was the light; the light flowed through and around God, and God Himself was the light.

 

Na kratko, izraz v začetku je zgrešen, bol pravilno bi bilo; temeljna bit vsega stvarstva je bila velika svetla misel o stvarjenju.

pozdravljen,najprej bi rada rekla,da na žalost ne znam angleško,oziroma premalo,da bi razumela,očitno je to nekakšna razlaga,ampak to mi ne zadostuje,te prosim,da prevedeš,če hočeš,te pa zaenkrat samo vprašam,če mogoče veš,odkdaj obstoja vesolje,v dopolnilo razlage pa dobiš jutri,ampak najprej prevedi lp

[zerkalo]

Ne hvali se z jutrišnjem dnem,kajti ne veš kaj današnji prinaša.Hvali nAj te drug,ne tvoja usta,tujec,ne tvoje ustnice.Težak je kamen in breme je pesek,težja od obeh je bedakova jeza{pregovori27,1}

 

Ideja ni odgovorna za ljudi, ki vanjo verujejo.

Don Marquis

[emanuel]

pozdravljen,najprej bi rada rekla,da na žalost ne znam angleško,oziroma premalo,da bi razumela,očitno je to nekakšna razlaga,ampak to mi ne zadostuje,te prosim,da prevedeš,če hočeš,te pa zaenkrat samo vprašam,če mogoče veš,odkdaj obstoja vesolje,v dopolnilo razlage pa dobiš jutri,ampak najprej prevedi lp

Kot je men znano, vesolje obstaja nekako med 12 do 15 miljard let. Kar pa je še vedno daleč od večnosti. Tudi, če bi to ševilo pomnožil s 1000 x 1000, bi blo še vedno zlo daleč od večnosti.

 

Ko bom imel čas, pa ko se mi bo dal, ti napišem v slovenščini.

[mici59]

Kot je men znano, vesolje obstaja nekako med 12 do 15 miljard let. Kar pa je še vedno daleč od večnosti. Tudi, če bi to ševilo pomnožil s 1000 x 1000, bi blo še vedno zlo daleč od večnosti.

 

Ko bom imel čas, pa ko se mi bo dal, ti napišem v slovenščini.

ti na kratko še jaz napišem nekaj važnih stvari,da si razčistiva pojme.On razpenja nad praznino severno nebo,zemljo drži obešeno nad ničem{Job 26,7},On je ,ki prestoluje nad krogom zemlje,katerega prebivalci so kakor kobilice,,,,{Izaija40,22},V davnini si zemljo utemeljil,in delo tvojih rok je nebo,oba bosta prešla,ti pa ostaneš,vse se postara kakor oblačilo,kakor obleko,ki se menja,ju boš zamenjal{psalm102,26,27},,,,V tem in drugih odlomkih namiguje na propadanje ustvarjenega vesolja.To se slklada z drugim zakonom termodinamike,z zakonom o entropiji.To ,da se vesolje stara,razločno kaže na začetek vesolja,ki pa ga bo Bog ustvaril na novo,ustvaril bo tudi novo zemljo in nova nebesa,,kjer biva pravičnost,, o tem pa kdaj drugič,lep pozdrav in lahko noč

[kapica]

Jezus pravi,jaz sem življenje,jaz sem luč sveta,jaz sem kruh življenja,jaz sem resnica,jaz sem pot,jaz sem vrata,jaz sem dobri pastir,jaz sem vstajenje.

cemu tolk "nalepk?"

[mici59]

cemu tolk "nalepk?"

Pozdravljena,saj to niso nalepke,pač pa so kristalno svetle resnice.V svojem življenju jih je konkretno izkusilo nešteto ljudi iz vseh družbenih slojev.Živlenje se jim je spremenilo,kakor bi si prej ne mogli niti zamisliti.Kjer je brezup prej dušil razpoloženje in je srce pestil strah pred prihodnostjo,zdaj vladajo življenski pogum srečna gotovost in življenska radost.lep pozdrav

[mici59]

Micika a je kak psalm kjer piše

Izaija {232, 2007}

in kot kobilice prileteli bodo angelci srebrnih peroti v tunikah nosili bodo košare cekinov, Jakob jih napotil bo Raheli ta pa bo razprla svoj cvet na katerega po priletel krilati samorog Pornelij nabirati nektarja v obliki zvenketajočega res nullius.. :xx!:

v torek sem bila v piranu in na trgu 1.maja,ker ti pirančan tega nisi vedel