free

v sredini je MACONA! itaq

prou. ti dam prou, ampak sele takrat, ko bos o tvojih argumentih tudi spregovoril in z njimi pokazal, dokazal zakaj je tvoje mnenje primernejse od mojega! evo, delcek podlage za moje mnenje: O okoljskih izzivih preko umetnosti: ERA VULGARIS (16:08) Razstava eksponatov iz asfalta oz. bitumna se dotika samomorilnosti sodobne potrošniške družbe, ki skuša svoje nespametno početje kozmetično zakriti z vtisom skrbi za okolje. e.. vi!

O okoljskih izzivih preko umetnosti: ERA VULGARIS (16:08) Razstava eksponatov iz asfalta oz. bitumna se dotika samomorilnosti sodobne potrošniške družbe, ki skuša svoje nespametno početje kozmetično zakriti z vtisom skrbi za okolje.

O okoljskih izzivih preko umetnosti: ERA VULGARIS (16:08) Razstava eksponatov iz asfalta oz. bitumna se dotika samomorilnosti sodobne potrošniške družbe, ki skuša svoje nespametno početje kozmetično zakriti z vtisom skrbi za okolje.

O okoljskih izzivih preko umetnosti: ERA VULGARIS (16:08) Razstava eksponatov iz asfalta oz. bitumna se dotika samomorilnosti sodobne potrošniške družbe, ki skuša svoje nespametno početje kozmetično zakriti z vtisom skrbi za okolje.

nekateri ljudje so hitrejsega jezika kakor pameti... takim pac to ne bi bilo po godu kajne. seveda pa ni fer, ce nekdo nekaj popravlja za nazaj in se laze, da je pisal drugace kot je bilo res. ampak... tega je dosti manj, kakor tega da ljudje popravljajo svoje poste. zaradi pametnetjsih razllogov (porpavlajnje napak, drugacnega mnenja, dodajanej slik, besedil, novih tekstov, boljsa obrazlozitev, jasnejse komentiranje, zozanje vsebine, slovnicna korektura, etc... pomoje. morda bi bile kaksne druge spremebe dosti bolj primerne kot tale.. ampak o tem itaq razmislja, se odloca in predsvem konktretno uvaja (pomeni, da si vzame cas in nekaj konkeretno prakticno naredi) urednistvo z zadnjim pa verjamem da ni malo dela. sploh pa, bi bilo s to uvedbo morda celo manj pisanja; kar nikomur ni po godu. morda bi se ljduje celo vzdrzali komentiranja, ker bi vedeli, da potem izjave ne bodo mogli izbrisati ali popraviti. morda dober vidik tvoje ideje pa je, da bi vsaj malo razmislisi preden karkoli napisemo - pomeni, bi postali bolj odgovorni!!

Španec pri 82 letih rekorder po številu diplom ...ki se je nato pri 73. letih odločil vpisati še medicino. Povedal je, da se je za ta študij odločil, potem ko mu je zdravnik zabrusil, naj ne komentira diagnoze, dokler sam ne bo diplomiral iz medicine. ------ Računalniški program razkriva naše genske prednike

V Gradcu prepovedali uporabo mobilnih telefonov na javnem prevozu DUNAJ - Avstrijsko mesto Gradec je v sredo izdalo prepoved uporabe mobitelov na javnem prevozu. Tovrstne odločitve, ki je v Avstriji zelo sporna, niso doslej sprejeli še nikjer na svetu. http://www.dnevnik.si/uploads/image_cache/b3dbf9bcb5b93b0197393066e0da19d1.jpeg Na Dunaju prepovedana uporaba telefona na javnem prevozu. (Foto: Tomaže Skale) Uredbo, ki zahteva, da se mobilne telefone na sredstvih javnega prevoza utiša, je izdal župan mesta Siegfried Nagel (ÖVP). Moteči naj bi namreč bili nenehno mrmranje ter potniki, ki na avtobusih ter tramvajih v tem južno avstrijskem mestu delijo svoje življenjske skrivnosti. Uredba prav tako prepoveduje glasno glasbo. Kljub temu ne bo nikakršnih kazni za kršitelje, ki ob vstopu na avtobus ne bodo hoteli utišati svojih najljubših mobilnih melodij. Prepoved so pozdravili pri avstrijski stranki Zelenih ter pri nekaterih ostalih mestnih upravah. Strokovnjaki pa so opozorili na možnost nasprotnega učinka, saj bi uredba lahko odvrnila mlade in poslovneže od uporabe javnega prevoza. Avstrijski socialni demokrati so medtem izrazili ostro kritiko uredbe ter jo označili kot nesodobno. Namesto uporabe prepovedi bi bilo potnike bolje spominjati na oliko, je povedal strokovnjak za javni prevoz na Dunaju. Številna druga avstrijska mesta razmišljajo o podobnih ukrepih. Glede na javnomnenjsko raziskavo, ki jo je izvedel časopis Kleine Zeitung, je 68 odstotkov prebivalcev Gradca pozdravilo idejo. vir: http://www.dnevnik.si/novice/neverjetno/313557/ -- kaksno je vase mnenje - so nam lahko vzgled ali pa se vam zdi, da je ideja preostra?

Baby with two faces worshipped as goddess http://www.foxnews.com/images/352079/1_21_twofacedbaby450.jpg http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/04/08/baby.heads.ap/art.LALI.TWO.jpg http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,337492,00.html http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/....ap/#cnnSTCText

Švedska uspešna z zelenimi ukrepi Švedska vlada je več kot podvojila sredstva za ukrep, s katerim porabnike nagrajuje za nakup do okolja prijaznega avtomobila. Z lanskim aprilom je namreč vlada začela ponujati okrog 1.100 evrov vsakemu državljanu, ki se je odločil za takšno potezo. V vladi so pričakovali od 10- do 15-odstotno povečanje prodaje, vendar je ukrep presegel pričakovanja, saj se je v letošnjem prvem četrtletju prodaja v primerjavi z lanskim obdobjem povečala kar za 50 odstotkov. Zato se je vlada odločila, da bo za ukrep, ki velja še do konca leta 2009, poleg že dodeljenih 10,6 mio. evrov namenila še dodatnih 25,6 mio. evrov sredstev. Avtomobili, ki spadajo v kategorijo zelenih, so tisti na bencinski pogon, ki imajo izpust nižji od 120 gramo ogljikovega dioksida na kilometer, električni avtomobili ter vozila na alternativne pogone kot na primer etanolne mešanice. Vir: rtvslo.si --------- nataly: Odlicno

dobu po mailu: Are Cell Phones More Dangerous Than Smoking? Award-winning cancer expert Dr. Vini Khurana has concluded that mobile phones may kill far more people than smoking or asbestos. The latest study, which is being called the most devastating indictment yet for the safety of mobile phones, draws on growing evidence that using handsets for 10 years or more can double your risk of brain cancer. Professor Khurana reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones, and concluded that "there is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumors." "We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation," he added. Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, particularly for children. Germany also advises people to minimize handset use. Khurana urges people to avoid using mobile phones whenever possible, and believes that governments and the mobile phone industry must take immediate steps to reduce exposure to this radiation. If nothing is done, Khurana believes the rate of malignant brain tumors and the associated death rate will rise around the world within a decade, and by then it may be too late to intervene medically. Sources: AlterNet March 30, 2008 Mobile Phones and Brain Tumors A Public Health Concern (PDF) Dare to Check Your Skin Lotion Ingredient Label? Your skin is your largest organ -- and the most visible! Heres what you should know about supporting radiantly healthy and beautiful skin all year long no matter what your skin type. Find Out More Dr. Mercola's Comments: You may think this headline sounds like a bit of a stretch, or perhaps even a major stretch. Well, I urge you to think again, as this headline, and the research behind it, is spot on. Professor Khurana based the notion that cell phones are more dangerous than smoking on the following logic: 3 billion people use cell phones worldwide, which is three times more than the amount of people who smoke. Of course, smoking doesnt immediately show any deadly signs either. But wait a decade or so, and the evidence is there right before your eyes. According to Khurana, the "incubation time" or "latency" (the time from the start of regular mobile phone usage to the diagnosis of a malignant solid brain tumor) is around 10-20 years. In the years 2008-2012, he says, we will have reached the appropriate length of follow-up time to begin to definitively observe the impact of this global technology on brain tumor incidence rates. There is VERY solid evidence that the number of brain tumors will increase to 500,000 per YEAR in 2010 -- and this will double to 1 million every year by 2015 if the causes are not addressed. Folks, this is the real deal and represents an impending health care crisis. Cell Phones Appear to be a MAJOR Health Risk I am absolutely convinced that the explosion of cell phone usage around the world is a major contributor to a host of diseases ranging from autism to cancer to insomnia. I am in the final editing phases of my next book, which is dedicated to this very topic and will be released in the spring or summer of 2009, or possibly sooner. You are fortunate, though, as you are receiving this information today, while there is still time to circumvent some of the damage. Please do not wait another 10 years for the definitive link to be found and publicized in the mainstream circles before you take action to protect yourself, and your children, from the electromagnetic radiation and information-carrying radio waves emitted by cell phones and many other wireless devices. If youre looking for some type of indication that cell phones are causing you harm, consider that all of the following ailments have been scientifically linked to information-carrying radio waves: Fatigue Headaches Sleep disruptions Altered memory function, poor concentration and spatial awareness Alzheimers, senility and dementia Parkinsons Autism Cancer Meanwhile, here is a sample of what Professor Khurana found after reviewing over 100 studies: Electromagnetic radiation such as that emitted by mobile and cordless phones can heat the side of your head or pulse it non-thermally, and potentially thermoelectrically interact with the organic electrical currents of your brain. Bluetooth devices and unshielded headsets can convert your head into an effective, potentially self-harming antenna. Exposure is long-term and its effects on your body, particularly its electrical organ, your brain, are compounded by numerous other simultaneous long-term exposures including continuous waves from radio and TV transmitter towers, cordless phone base stations, power lines, and wireless/WiFi computing devices. Do You STILL Believe That Cell Phones are Safe? Well, if youre finding it hard to believe that a widely used technology such as cell phones and wireless technologies could be causing you harm, it may help to compare it to other technologies that were once widely accepted: The shoe-fitting fluoroscope, an X-ray machine used to look at the bones of your foot in order to judge your shoe size. Radioactive drinking water, toothpaste, hair tonic and candy. Soothing syrup for children that contained morphine, chloroform, codeine, heroin, opium and cannabis. Mercury, the highly toxic metal, used to treat everything from cuts to constipation. Heroin, which was originally developed and sold as a cough suppressant. Even cigarette smoking was once described as healthy! Cell Phones are Just One Part of the Problem Information-carrying radio waves are all around us -- especially from cell phones, but also from WiFi, WiMax, BlueTooth, and other wireless devices. And you are likely receiving exposure to them 24/7. Its important to understand that the danger from most land-based portable phones, cell phones and WiFi routers is NOT from the microwave carrier wave, for which typical SAR ratings are given on phones. This SAR rating indicates the thermal effect emitted by your phone, which is totally insignificant, unless you have massive exposures like you might expect in a microwave oven. This is why the discussion about lowering the allowable SAR is pointless, as it will NOT make cell phones safer. Instead, nearly all your biological damage comes from the modulated signals that are carried ON the carrier microwave. These modulated information-carrying radio waves resonate (vibrate) in the same frequencies as many of your cellular receptors; frequencies of a few to a few hundred cycles per second. These are biological frequencies and, unlike ionizing radiation (X-rays), which you can tolerate in small doses, there is NO dose of these radio waves that are safe. They cause damage at ANY dose, no matter how low. This concept is called zero threshold, and that is precisely what you have with cell phones, most portable phones, and WiFi routers. These information-carrying radio waves can stimulate or confuse your cellular receptors, causing a whole cascade of pathological consequences that can culminate in fatigue, sleeplessness, anxiety, neurological decline, and ultimately cancers. The reason why children should NOT use cell phones is because they have developing nervous systems and thinner skulls than adults, making them especially vulnerable to this type of damage. Can Cell Phones be Used Safely? In the best-case scenario, you would turn off your cell phone, put it in the glove compartment of your car or in a briefcase, and only use it in emergencies. Obviously, many of you have come to rely on your cell phone for much more than this, but remember it wasnt long ago that we all got along fine without them -- and its not too late to go back to that point. Remember, kids should NOT be using cell phones. As a parent, its up to you to protect them from this avoidable risk. Assuming you do choose to use a cell phone for more than just emergences, here are the tips to increase your safety level (for cell phones and other radio-wave exposures): Limit the amount of time you spend on a cell phone or cordless phone. Use a wired headset to limit your exposure to the cell phone -- ideally, an air tube headset that conducts sound but prevents any radiation from traveling up the wire to your brain. Also, make sure the wire is SHIELDED, which prevents it from acting as an antenna that could attract more information-carrying radio waves directly to your brain. Wireless BlueTooth headsets should be avoided. Limit your exposure to WiFi routers. Find out where they are located in your work environment and stay away from them. If you have any land-based (non-cellular) portable phones, do NOT use anything other than the 900 MHz phones, as the Gigahertz phones stay on continuously, blasting you with information-carrying radio waves 24/7. Use the speakerphone instead of putting the phone to your ear; this is probably one of the single most important steps you can take other than not using your cell phone. Limit calls inside buildings. Use your cell phone only where the reception is good. When the reception is poor, your phone has to work harder, and therefore emits a much stronger radiation signal.

tole tvoje zadnje je cist neiskreno prebrat zdej ma ja, ne da se mi vec folozofirat.. k bi lahk pisu se full, itaq. bodi fajn tut ti!

da da, saj govoriva isto. se strinjam! (ame vidis kot sovraznega vegija al kaj? ) ko ze ravno pravis... se pomislil: je pa tut vprasanje zakaj nek extremist "potrebuje" extrem sploh!? a ves. zdej, verjetno nismo mi tisti, ki mu bomo rekli: "ej tega ne potrebujes", ker verjetno s svojim nacinom kljub temu ne bo nehal... seveda pa je odvisno od tega kje je.... ce je tolk dalec, da je pripravljen kaj spustiti, in ze pocasi dojema, da nacin ki ga je imel morda ni bil najprimernejsi, in da se dA morda tudi drugace. jasno, nekdo bo slisal ze namig, nekdo pa sele ko ga povozi tank. poznal sem ljudi, ki nasvetov niso poslusali, dokler niso mocno zboleli. potem pa so spremenili nacin zivljenja, ker so se tako sami odlocili. skoda je le, ker vedno mislimo ,da smo najbolj pametni, itaq . pomoje smo vsi v svojih lifeih ze izkusili in ziveli neke extreme. lekcije, ki smo jih doumeli in katerih (nekaterih) ne ponavljamo vec. No, nekatere pa pac se do nadaljnega. meni zelo zanimivo, simbolicno je to opisal nek slovenski skladatelj, znanec, ki je bil gost v neki oddaji, ko so govorili tudi o tem, kako se ljudje prevec zenejo za uspehom, prevec naprezajo, ipd... pribl tako: "smo kot na krozniku. kadar smo v sredini, smo v svojem srediscu, smo zmerni, harmonicni in uravnotezeni. kadar pa se pomikamo proti robu (morda zaradi zelja, ambicioznosti, tekmovalnosti, extremov, ipd, pa izgubljamo ravnotezje. mi se zenemo in zenemo in se zenemo, kljub prvim manjsim opozorilom, da nacin ni najbolj primeren. najprej nam zivljenje da klofuto. bolj ko gremo proti robu pa mocnejse klofute. potem dobimo ze kako brco... ko smo ze cisto proti robu ali ze na robu pa nas povozi tank v opozorilo. in ce se takrat ne vrnemo v sredino, harmonicnost nam pomoci ni vec." zdej se ravno vesak priblizuje. Ko se budina luc ponovno spusti v najvecji meri. on je ucil srednje poti. matr, ziveti zmerno je pomoje res hud izziv sodobnemu cloveku potrosniske druzbe

tipu otipaval no, mislim, da tega piknika ne bo. vsaj z moje strani ne. se pa dogaja drugi malo kasneje >>>, ki se bolj sovpada z idejo prisotnih

bravo! vis da se da!

grozno, kar popravljajo in brisejo poste za seboj...

itaq

butl: ja. razlicni smo - univerzalni recept je verjetno morda edinole ljubezen (ugibam). vse drugo pa... no, morda pot do tja! in ta pot so vse te prepreke s katerimi se soocamo prav vsi. lahko jim recemo izzivi. stvarnost pa je se vedno ta, da neglede kako cisti so nekateri otroci, so nekateri bolni zaradi kemikalij, strupov, toksinov, ki so jih uzivali ze njihovi starsi, konkretno mama! Dokazovali so celo to, da (nekateri) toksini preidejo iz matere na otroka! Dobre misli, pozitiva ipd, so vedno dobrodosle; toda tudi fizicno in etersko temo ima svoje zahteve in meje!

bravo, bravo, grandisimo!!! matr, a sm lahk tvoj prjatu

da. dr. Sanja Rozman – Odvisnost od odnosov

Se strinjam! Seveda pa spet zadeav ni tako crno-bela. Odvisno kaksni toksini in strupi so, kako mocni so in kako na doloceno osebo vpčlivajo. Spet, kaksne misli, custva je nekdo usmrejav v hrano, kaksna intenziva, in kako bodo vplivala na doloceo osebo. Sicer pa se s teboj zelo strinjam! Ze Masaru Emoto je dokazoval, da misli vplivajo na kristale vode; torej materijo! vec o tem na spletu ali v blogu "kapice" (ce se prav spomnim) G. Gabriel Devrrindt - priznanti nutricist, znastvenik in biolog je na moje vprasanje: kako misli vplivajo na recimo raka, toksicnost organizma etc... (tema cetrtkovega predavanja v hotelu Lev v Lj. je bila "s hrano nad toksine" etc...) je povedal sledece: "Lahko uzivate se tako zdravo hrano, pa vam ne pomaga, ce razmisljate negativno!" tukaj pa je se intervju z njim, ki so ga psoneli v studiu 12 >>>> res malce ven teme, toda vseeno zelo povezano! Se strinjam, NI hecno. Kljub temu je dobro, da tudi to sprejmemo s cimvec veselja ce ne drugega, dodamo malo svoje boljse vibre k hrani.

Rubrika Medsebojni odnosi: http://www.s12.si/component/option,com_sey...mid,62/catid,8/

mi sami nimamo dovolj - sala stoletja! - poglej okoli sebe kako so razporejena sredstva ljudi. - to je kljuc!!!! in vse drugo je povsem mozno! v glavnem se nikakor NE strinjam s teboj! drugic vec, oz. obrazlozitev. - toda le v primeru, ce mislis "normalno" debatirat, brez manjvrednostnih izrazov itn... sicer se pejt ment kam na jug oz. sebi primernim osebam. za pricetek pa malo poslusaj strokovnjake, ce zelis seveda in dopuscas, da je se kdo malo bolj pameten kot ti; vsaj vcasih no (24:22) Povzetek okrogle mize o GSO, poletje 2007, Cankarjev dom, Ljubljana

Mudre - energijska in simbolna govorica rok (23:48) Mudre so način uporabe rok in telesa, pri katerih s pomočjo posameznih gibov in položajev spodbujamo določene psihološke in energijske kvalitete. Kakšna je dejanska uporabnost muder? Ali je za današnjega človeka to znanje praktično uporabno? O mudrah je spregovoril Primož Škoberne, Šola zdravja Eliksir.